Archive for October 1st, 2009

WWE on Muchnick’s CHRIS & NANCY — The Twitter Daily Dozen for October 1

For a live feed of this continuing series, follow @irvmuch at Twitter.

PARTS 13 – 24

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 13 Top Nine List of supposedly “unanswered questions” regarding the murders committed by Chris Benoit.

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 14 In reality, none are questions at all but rather your uninformed musing and falsehoods.

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 15 We address each below. 1. “Congress: All Lick and No Stick” – Vince McMahon did not “no show”

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 16 Congressman Rush’s hearing, as you have stated. As the written record clearly shows, Mr. McMahon

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 17 was “invited” to attend and told he had the right to counsel by the invitation. I was personally

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 18 involved in a criminal trial for another client and had an incurable conflict as a result.

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 19 Mr. Rush’s committee was so advised. Beyond that, I would add that WWE produced all the records

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 20 Mr. Rush’s committee asked for long ago and never heard another word from that committee until

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 21 it “invited” Mr. McMahon to appear. Additionally, WWE also provided additional documents

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 22 to Congressman Waxman’s committee, and Mr. McMahon personally answered questions by their staff.

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 23 In short, Congress has received complete cooperation from WWE.

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 24 2. “Dr. Astin/Signature Pharmacy/DEA” – As noted, the precise “unanswered question” you seek


Irv’s Tweets